The idea encapsulates 4 distinct stress responses noticed in people going through perceived threats. These reactions manifest as both confrontation (struggle), escape (flight), immobilization (freeze), or appeasement (fawn). A person experiencing a office battle would possibly reply with aggressive habits (struggle), try and keep away from the state of affairs (flight), develop into unable to behave or communicate (freeze), or attempt to placate the aggressor (fawn).
Understanding these reactions is essential for recognizing and addressing the impression of trauma and power stress. Figuring out dominant response patterns can facilitate the event of extra adaptive coping mechanisms. Moreover, consciousness of those reactions can present a framework for deciphering habits in each private {and professional} contexts. The mannequin advanced from earlier analysis on acute stress responses and expands the understanding of how people react to extended or advanced trauma.
